Three Judges Scoring Original Costume Designs
This is an invented planning exercise, not a customer event or testimonial.
Background and constraints
A fictional original-character contest uses three judges and three published criteria. The host wants the same weighting applied to every sheet.
Exact tool inputs
| names | Ari Bea Cleo |
|---|---|
| criteria | Craft,Interpretation,Presentation |
| weights | 40,35,25 |
| judges | 3 |
Actual generated result
- names
- Ari
- Bea
- Cleo
- criteria
- Craft
- Interpretation
- Presentation
- weights
- 40
- 35
- 25
- judges
- 3
- scores
- 8
- 6
- 10
- 8
- 6
- 10
- 8
- 6
- 10
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 5
- 7
- 7
- 7
- 7
- 7
- 7
- 7
- 7
- 7
- rankings
- name
- Ari
- score
- 7.8
- rank
- 1
- name
- Cleo
- score
- 7
- rank
- 2
- name
- Bea
- score
- 5
- rank
- 3
Planning process
The organizer generates the sheets, then enters the fictional scores shown in the result. Ari receives 8 for craft, 6 for interpretation and 10 for presentation from each judge. The weighted total is calculated for each sheet and averaged across the panel.
Result explanation
Ari’s score is 8×0.40 + 6×0.35 + 10×0.25 = 7.8. Cleo’s equal sevens yield 7.0 and Bea’s equal fives yield 5.0. The ranking follows the announced arithmetic, not the order of entry.
Alternative
Use fewer criteria if judges cannot reliably distinguish them. Publish any change before entrants prepare or perform.
Execution notes
All marks are fictional demonstration inputs. Use original or appropriately licensed designs and obtain separate photography permission.
Continue planning
How to Create Fair Tournament Rules and Scoring
A Shared First Place Followed by Rank Three
FAQ
Are these real event records?
No. All people, dates, constraints and planning amounts in this scenario are fictional inputs supplied to demonstrate a workflow.
How can I try this plan?
Open the linked tool, enter the exact inputs above, review the result and save it locally. Export a backup if you want a separate copy.