Two Equally Weighted Criteria for a Small Contest
This is an invented planning exercise, not a customer event or testimonial.
Background and constraints
A fictional four-entry contest values concept and explanation equally. The score record deliberately produces four equal totals.
Exact tool inputs
| names | Ari Bea Cleo Dev |
|---|---|
| criteria | Original concept,Clear explanation |
| weights | 50,50 |
| judges | 1 |
Actual generated result
- names
- Ari
- Bea
- Cleo
- Dev
- criteria
- Original concept
- Clear explanation
- weights
- 50
- 50
- judges
- 1
- scores
- 8
- 6
- 7
- 7
- 9
- 5
- 6
- 8
- rankings
- name
- Ari
- score
- 7
- rank
- 1
- name
- Bea
- score
- 7
- rank
- 1
- name
- Cleo
- score
- 7
- rank
- 1
- name
- Dev
- score
- 7
- rank
- 1
Planning process
The host enters two criteria at 50 percent each and records the pairs 8–6, 7–7, 9–5 and 6–8. Every weighted total is 7.0. The announced shared-place rule is applied instead of treating the strongest single criterion as an improvised tie-break.
Result explanation
Different score profiles can yield the same final total. Equal weighting is a real design decision, so the host must accept its possible ties unless an additional rule was published beforehand.
Alternative
Change the rubric for a future contest after reviewing the experience, not retroactively for this result.
Execution notes
These are fictional marks. Keep the judge sheet and show the calculation if participants ask how the shared outcome arose.
Continue planning
How to Create Fair Tournament Rules and Scoring
A Four-Criterion Jury Sheet for Original Craft
FAQ
Are these real event records?
No. All people, dates, constraints and planning amounts in this scenario are fictional inputs supplied to demonstrate a workflow.
How can I try this plan?
Open the linked tool, enter the exact inputs above, review the result and save it locally. Export a backup if you want a separate copy.